What would Jesus drive?
An interview with Bill McKibben

by Julie A. Wortman

Bill McKibben is a former staff writer for The New Yorker and author of The End of Nature (Anchor, 1989), Maybe One (Plume, 1999) and, most recently, Long Distance: A Year of Living Strenuously (Simon & Schuster, 2000). He has been a longtime climate-change watchdog, rare in his strong faith-based perspective.

Julie Wortman: Last summer I saw a newspaper article about an anti-SUV protest you were involved with outside a car dealership in Lynn, Mass., just on the outskirts of Boston. What was that about?

Bill McKibben: Well, during the 2000—2001 academic year I was a fellow at Harvard Divinity School’s Center for the Study of Values in Public Life writing a book on human genetic engineering. But one of the things that I was doing while I was there was a lot of volunteer work on SUVs, among other things. I’ve worked for most of my life on climate-change issues – I wrote sort of the original book for a general audience on it all, The End of Nature, way back in 1989. And, of course, transportation is a big part of that. One of the great difficulties of working on climate change is that it has remained largely an abstract issue in this country and we’ve made extremely little progress – in fact, none! Americans, in the year 2000, managed to produce about 15 percent more carbon dioxide than they did in the year 1990. So, it’s very clear that we’re losing badly on this issue. So a lot of us have been thinking over the years that we need some very real symbols to make it real for people. The SUV is probably the perfect one, because it’s very practical. I mean, it’s very much a part of the problem. Just as the back of the bus was a very real phenomenon for people in the South in a certain era.

If you have a normal car – an Escort or a Taurus or something – and you go in and you trade it in and you get one of the larger SUVs and you drive it for one year, the difference in the amount of energy you use – and hence the amount of CO2 that you produce – is the same as walking over to your refrigerator this afternoon, opening the door and leaving it open until 2009.

So it’s a very real issue. By far the biggest reason that America’s CO2 emissions kept climbing so quickly in the 1990s was because we were converting our automobile fleet into this urban assault fleet. So the SUV is a tremendously good symbol of our heedlessness in the way that we use energy, because so much of it is unnecessary. I mean, no one would begrudge a big vehicle with four-wheel-drive and high clearance to a forest ranger, you know? That makes a lot of sense – if you’re a good forest ranger, you’ve got to be out in the middle of nowhere all the time.

But for the most part we have no need of these kind of vehicles. We’ve bought them for some combination of putative safety concerns, which turn out to be illusory when you examine them, and much more for some kind of status and image concerns, you know? Someone in Madison Avenue was able to convince us that you are somehow, among other things, more closely bonded with the natural world if you are driving one of these. That’s what all the ads are about.

Julie Wortman: I noticed that you had a number of people at that particular protest who were prominent people of faith?

Bill McKibben: Yes.

Julie Wortman: Why is it so important that people of faith be involved?

Bill McKibben: Well, what can I say? I’m a Methodist Sunday School teacher. For me, this has always been part of my reason for caring about the environment, this sense that we’re talking about this creation. So we wanted very much to involve this community that hadn’t been involved as deeply as it should. Every important American social movement that I can think of has required the participation of the church to get its message across and I think that the environment is no exception. And I think it’s really starting to happen.

Julie Wortman: What are the signs you see?

Bill McKibben: Well, I’ve been working on this for a long time and talking to church groups is one of the things that I do. Ten years ago it was, "Huh?" People didn’t really get it. Now people know that they need to be involved and the question is how much and how radical should our involvement be? I think that within a very short period of time – as with peace issues and hunger issues – it’s going to be taken for granted that this is one of the prophetic witnesses that the church is called to make, especially because it’s so linked to all the other justice issues. There’s no more effective way that Americans have ever figured out to screw up the lives of people around the world – and goodness knows we’ve come up with our share in the past – than changing the basic daily physical stability of the world those people depend on. I was in Bangladesh not long ago and it was a great country, a beautiful country – very crowded, but food self-sufficient. Their only problem is that they’re a river delta and they’re very low to the ground, very low to the water. So if you raise sea level even a little bit, which global warming does because warm water takes up more space than cold water, then you’ll be getting very regular and massive floods. In 1998 two-thirds of the country was under water for the better part of three months – under high, deep water – and that’s because of us! They’re not producing any CO2. The basic method of transportation in Bangladesh is the bicycle-powered rickshaw! We produce one quarter of the world’s CO2. If they’re walking around in water, it is our responsibility.

Julie Wortman: Environmentalist Philip Shabecoff [see TW 6/02] says that one of the failures of the environmental movement is that it hasn’t made those connections with social justice kinds of issues. Would you agree with that?

Bill McKibben: I don’t know to what extent it’s been a failure, but it’s certainly been an important part of our work over the years.

Julie Wortman: I was just thinking that maybe it’s faith communities that can best make those connections?

Bill McKibben: Yeah! I think you could run it the other way, too, and say it’s been a major failing of faith communities over the years not to understand that one of the things that they’re called upon to do is witness to and protect the integrity of creation. There have been too many examples of faith communities whose involvements in issues like hunger and social justice and whatever is incredibly episodic and limited largely to giving people tents after they’ve had some terrible disaster and very little to figuring out what the real root causes of all these problems are.

Julie Wortman: Yes. I think sometimes that what happens among people of faith is they’re very comfortable with disaster relief, but not very comfortable with the substantive issues – economic and social issues – that need to be addressed.

Bill McKibben: In this case they’re not very comfortable with the idea that they’re the cause of the disaster. One of the points that I’ve been trying to make in recent years is that it’s inaccurate to talk about such things as huge floods as acts of God. There was a time when that language made perfect sense, but sometime in the last 20 or 30 years, human beings as a species have grown large enough that we really do alter the basic climatic patterns on the planet because of our use of fossil fuels.

Warm air holds more water vapor than cold air does. Therefore you get more evaporation, more drought in arid areas and you get more precipitation, more deluge in wet areas. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that 1998, which was the warmest year on record, also saw 3 million human beings, one human being in 20, forced from their homes by flooding. That’s not an act of God; that’s not a natural disaster. That’s at least in part a man-made disaster. And we need to start thinking about them in those ways and taking responsibility for them.

Julie Wortman: What’s your take on U.S. energy policy?

Bill McKibben: I think U.S. energy policy is a complete joke! And I think it’s been a bi-partisan commitment to do nothing about these issues now for a number of years – and it continues.

Julie Wortman: Why is that?

Bill McKibben: Well, for two reasons. One: There’s an enormous vested interest of energy companies, also fuel industries, in our political system and we see that all the more clearly in the wake of things like Enron or in the wake of the acknowledgment that the Bush administration energy policy was written by the fossil-fuel industry!

And probably even more important is that our political leaders are extremely scared that if they do anything to change our absolute reliance on cheap oil that voters will punish them for it, that people are unwilling to pay a little more for gasoline, or make the other fairly modest changes that would be necessary to jump-start the transition to a sensible and at least semi-sustainable way of life.

Julie Wortman: What would be your top three picks of changes people could make?

Bill McKibben: Drive less. You know, if Americans eliminated one car trip in 14, if they were able to plan ahead sufficiently to go to the grocery store three times a week instead of four, it would overnight reduce our fossil fuel use about 5 percent.

Drive small. We just traded in our old Honda Civic, which got 40 miles to the gallon and got a new Honda Civic hybrid – we actually got the first one in the state of Vermont – two weeks ago. So we’re tooling around now in a car that’s cheap – $20,000, so way below the median price of a new car – and that drives absolutely ordinarily. Nothing in it is odd or unusual. You don’t have to plug it in. It’s just a Honda Civic – the most vanilla car there ever could be, but because it’s got this small engine with an electric battery to assist it, we’re getting about 55 miles to the gallon!

So that’s number two. And number three is engage in the political action necessary to make these changes permanent. The Senate last month, with 19 Democrats going along, voted against the proposal – the modest proposal – to raise average gasoline mileage to 35 miles per gallon by the year 2015! So, you know, way less than the Honda Civic that I traded in to get this new one.

Julie Wortman: Now, here’s a question: We had some people that we gave a Witness award to in 2000, Wally and Juanita Nelson, who are long-time activists and people who live simply on the land and so on. We wanted to fly them to the place where we were having this awards event and Juanita said, "If we come, we’re going to have to come by train" because of the huge amounts of energy that airplanes consume. Now, I know you travel a lot by air. Would you recommend reductions in that kind of travel?

Bill McKibben: Well, the same things apply. I do my best and I’m extremely cognizant of the fact that there’s something extremely odd about flying to parts of the world to urge people to produce less CO2. What can I say? One makes one’s pacts with the devil where one feels one absolutely has to!

But that’s absolutely right. Now in statistical terms, it’s driving that’s the single biggest problem by far. That’s where fuel gets used the most. On the other hand, it’s air travel that often is the most discretionary of all transportations. It’s crazy the way that we all hop on airplanes at the drop of a hat, especially now, when there are emerging good technological alternatives. Like video conferencing and things like that.

Julie Wortman: Right. I think a lot of people learned that after 9/11.

Bill McKibben: Yes, and they get tired of being searched like criminals every time they take an airplane now. 9/11 certainly highlighted a lot of these questions for everyone and should have made it clear to us what a stupid idea our very centralized energy system and our deep reliance on cheap oil is for security things as well as everything else. But at some deep level this really should be much more of a moral issue for us than it is. And that’s one of the reasons that we were trying to get clergy so involved. To me the highlight of that SUV protest in Lynn was my friend Dan Smith, who’s the assistant pastor of the church where I grew up, and his big sign that said, "What would Jesus drive?" That was the image that the newspapers fixed on for the most part and rightly so. I mean, there is no more important environmental decision that most people make in the course of a decade. The only other one is how many children should I have? What car you are going to drive is the kind of decision that one needs to pray over.

Julie Wortman: What do you say to the people who have become convinced, but they own an old Explorer?

Bill McKibben: I think that if they’re able to go and get something like a hybrid vehicle that it makes real sense, because not only are you dramatically decreasing your fuel use, you’re also kind of jump-starting these alternative technologies.

Julie Wortman: One of the other posters at the Lynn protest said, "Test drive your feet. Walk away from SUVs." That’s a nice poster because it can be read on a number of different levels. I’ve been noticing that more and more people are talking about walkable and bikable communities.

Bill McKibben: Absolutely. Bikes and feet. I love being able to ride my bike to work. It’s one of my greatest pleasures at the moment. But we’ve become disembodied as Americans, and that is hard to cure because we’ve set up living situations that make it unfriendly to walk or ride – suburbs, for example, where things are farther away than they should be. But an awful lot of people manage to overcome that anyway and in the process to become slightly less alienated from their bodies as well.

Julie Wortman: So it sounds like churches could really take a lead on a spirituality of embodiment?

Bill McKibben: Absolutely. And do it in very practical ways with small steps like having church outdoors and for the minister to make sure he’s out on his bike all the time. The town we’re in at the moment is a wonderful town – Middlebury, Vt. – and our local Episcopal pastor, Catherine Nichols, was the first person in town to have one of these hybrid cars. The license plate says "70 mpg" and there she is, in her collar some of the time, driving that around. Well, that’s a powerful witness. There was a big Earth Day celebration on the lawn of her church, too.

Julie Wortman: There’s a guy, Jan Lundberg, in Arcata, Calif., who has an alliance for a paving moratorium. And then there’s also a group called Wild Lands CPR, which means Center for Preventing Roads. What do you think of these anti-road campaigns?

Bill McKibben: At the very least, I think everyone should be able to agree that we have enough roads. We don’t need more of them and in fact in all sorts of cases, like old service roads and things, it makes great sense to be retiring roads that we no longer need. And some day we’ll retire a lot of them.

Julie Wortman: Well, I’m kind of fascinated by this, because while the anti-SUV campaign has the virtue of being very concrete, the anti-road campaign has the virtue of catching people off guard.

Bill McKibben: Yeah, absolutely. I’ve worked hardest on the things that have the most immediate payoff, because I’ve spent my career worrying about CO2. And we really only have a very, very few decades to dramatically reduce the amount of it that goes into the atmosphere. We’ve already waited far too long to avoid serious damage. Everything I do is predicated at some level on most bang for the buck in terms of results. But I think that people like Jan Lundberg are real visionaries doing absolutely crucial work.

Julie Wortman: It’s encouraging to see the creativity that’s out there with respect to approaching the question.

Bill McKibben: Absolutely. It’s so exciting to go places and see places that have managed to pioneer all sorts of new alternatives. I wrote about a city in Brazil once in a book of mine, a book called Hope, Human and Wild. I wrote about a city called Curitiba, south of Brazil. A city of now I think almost four million people. It has the best bus system in the world and it’s just amazing beyond belief what a wonderful transit system it has and as a result, its citizens use about 25 percent less fuel than other Brazilians. That’s a really big number. And it highlights the point that changes in behavior are possible.

If you go to any poor part of the world you realize that when people don’t have the luxury of being able to buy their own huge machine to drive around, then people come up with dozens and dozens of other completely effective ways to move around. And then when you go to other rich parts of the world, like Europe, you realize that with a very little thought people are able to conceive of infinitely more elegant systems than we’ve come up with.

Julie Wortman: And why is that?

Bill McKibben: They’ve taken these issues more seriously for a longer time. They live in somewhat more concentrated circumstances that make other transit alternatives a little bit easier and they’re not as thoroughly evangelized by the gospel of comfort and convenience above all as we have been.

The kind of complete and utter hyper-individualism that would lead someone to drive by themselves down the highway in a 3-ton SUV hasn’t infected Europe to quite the same degree.

Julie Wortman: After September 11, we were asked to spend money.

Bill McKibben: Go shopping.

Julie Wortman: I probably should remember who said this, but a columnist pointed out that people were eager to be contributing to the welfare of the nation and that it could have been a moment to call for energy conservation.

Bill McKibben: There are a lot of people saying this was THE great opportunity. On September 12, the President could have said, "Look we’ve got two jobs. One job is we’ve got to track down this guy bin Laden and the other job is we’ve got to change forever our reliance on fossil fuel."

We could have done it! We still could do it. There’s something pathetic about the sight of people going out and buying SUVs, sticking American flags on them. You might as well stick a Saudi flag on them – that’s who benefits if you’re driving around in one. It doesn’t help us.

Julie A. Wortman is editor/publisher of The Witness.